tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3052406779197845814.post271553864237905195..comments2024-03-14T01:22:21.483-04:00Comments on Basil's Blog: The Oreo ScandalBasilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00304218067534993876noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3052406779197845814.post-8215307670521068252013-08-22T06:44:21.000-04:002013-08-22T06:44:21.000-04:00This just proves that Double Stuf Oreos are not qu...This just proves that <i>Double Stuf Oreos</i> are not quite up to the <i><b>"Double your pleasure! Double your fun!"</b></i> standard expected of chewy, minty sweets. But they certainly are more accessible than Miss Anony's <i><b>"Two! Two Mints In One!"</b></i> confections that get handed out like rare door prizes. And, as you point out, Basil, one can do <i><b>Science!</b></i> on them!<br><br><br><br>BTW, have you seen my car keys?Jimmynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3052406779197845814.post-16616141649563323402013-08-22T07:31:59.000-04:002013-08-22T07:31:59.000-04:00They're probably right, but the sample size is...They're probably right, but the sample size is too small. Plus they probably used a Stuf-scraping method that took off just a few crumbs of cookie, enough to influence the outcome. <br><br><br><br>One thing I can promise is that I am roughly 1.86 times the stuf I used to be. Just ask my scale.FredKeyhttp://vitaminfred.blog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3052406779197845814.post-31794756142244469542013-08-22T07:35:25.000-04:002013-08-22T07:35:25.000-04:00A story about OREO COOKIES on Fox Faux 'News&#...A story about OREO COOKIES on Fox <i>Faux</i> 'News'?<br><br>Clearly <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=oreo+cookie" rel="nofollow">racist!</a><br><br><br><br><br><br>Don't read them all.....trust me .NoMoBamahttp://www.swfcabin.com/open/1256414086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3052406779197845814.post-82064813689654962092013-08-22T07:39:45.000-04:002013-08-22T07:39:45.000-04:00Oreo arithmetic is brought to you by the people wh...Oreo arithmetic is brought to you by the people who shrunk chocolate bars to the size of my pinkie. And I guess by the folks who make Ikea furniture, too. However, if we were all 7% smaller than standard size, I suppose things would seem less crowded. Cats would become a serious threat, though.Vaktatunnennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3052406779197845814.post-46902585144207013532013-08-22T07:45:42.000-04:002013-08-22T07:45:42.000-04:00Not a very good test, if you ask me. They used a v...Not a very good test, if you ask me. They used a very small sample size, and one one measurement. You'd need at least a whole bag of each kind of Oreo; taking not only their individual mass but the volume too (Either by linear measurements or displacement.)<br><br>To be thorough, you'd want to do this for whole cookies and cookies w/o stuff. If possible, take measurements of the filling too, but that can get messy - especially with volume measurements.Mrs. Campbellhttps://plus.google.com/u/0/117067079261259371394noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3052406779197845814.post-60827259634376144992013-08-22T09:15:19.000-04:002013-08-22T09:15:19.000-04:00There’s only one way to get to the bottom of this....There’s only one way to get to the bottom of this. We’re going to have to repeat the experiment. Many times, possibly. And, of course, eat the Oreos when we’re done.<br><br><br><br>I am prepared to make this sacrifice for <b><i>Science!</i></b> Unto the breach, dear friends!Crabby Old Batnoreply@blogger.com