Showing posts with label Satire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Satire. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Satire News Sites Sue ESPN Over Intellectual Property Infringement

ESPN reporter Robert Lee
ATLANTA (AP) -- Several satirical news Websites have file suit in federal court in Atlanta against ESPN alleging the sports network has infringed on their intellectual property. The suit comes days after ESPN announced that the network was removing reporter Robert Lee from the University of Virginia home game on September 2.

Kurt Mueller, COO of The Onion, said that the network's actions are "a clear infringement of The Onion's intellectual property. This should be an open and shut case. After all, when news of Mr. Lee's reassignment was announced, social media exploded with questions asking if it was a post on The Onion." The topic was trending on Facebook and Twitter.

The Onion was joined in the lawsuit by news satire Websites Weekly World News, Babylon Bee, DuffleBlog, and others. Paul Szoldra of DuffleBlog explained, "While we focus on satirical news from the military standpoint, an infringement against mainstream humor is an infringement against us all."

Weekly World News spokesman Bat Boy said "The lawsuit speaks for itself." Babylon Bee's Adam Ford added, "Yeah, what he said."

Thursday, October 31, 2013

If Orson Welles had been born 75 years later...

ANNOUNCER: The Columbia Broadcasting System and its affiliated stations present Orson Welles and the Mercury Theatre on the Air!

[MUSIC: "Piano Concerto No. 1 in B-flat minor, Op. 23" - P. Tchaikovsky, arranged and conducted by Bernard Herrmann]


ANNOUNCER: Ladies and gentlemen: the director of the Mercury Theatre and star of these broadcasts, Orson Welles ...


ORSON WELLES: We know now that in the early years of the twenty-first century this country was being watched closely by beings different than normal man and yet as mortal as he.


We know now that as human beings busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinized and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinize the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water.


With infinite complacence people went to and fro over the nation about their little affairs, serene in the assurance of their dominion over this small spinning fragment of solar driftwood which by chance or design man has inherited out of the dark mystery of Time and Space.


Yet across an immense ethical gulf, minds that are as different from our minds as ours are to the beasts in the jungle, intellectuals, cool and unsympathetic, regarded this country with envious eyes and slowly and surely drew their plans against us.


In the thirteenth year of the twenty-first century came the great disillusionment. It was in October when the attack plans reached fruition. Obamacare was a reality...

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

2010 Oscar front-runner

Yes, we just had the 2009 Academy Awards. But, it is 2010. And here is a clip for the early front-runner for next year's Best Picture award.


[Direct link]

In theatres Date. This film has not yet been rated.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Archives: President Truman Deploying 30,000 More Troops, Plans Pullout Beginning July 1947

From the archives, December 1, 1945

WEST POINT, NY (CBS) -- President Truman announced his new strategy in the Pacific in a speech Saturday night, vowing to deploy 30,000 additional troops to the Pacific theatre as quickly as possible and setting July 1947 as a date to begin pulling U.S. forces out of the region.

"I do not make this decision lightly," the president said, telling more than 4,000 West Point Military Academy cadets that "as your Commander-in-Chief, I owe you a mission that is clearly defined, and worthy of your service."

CBS News chief war correspondent Larry LeSueur said Tuesday night that the speech will be looked back at as the "defining moment of the Truman presidency."

"This was the night when Harry Truman took full ownership of the war in the Pacific," he said.

The president also said that U.S. troops will begin to come home in approximately 18 months, though he did not set a date for a full withdrawal of American forces. The troop surge, he said, will "allow us to begin the transfer of our forces out of the Pacific in July of 1947."

In the highly-anticiated address, the president said that while gains had been made against Japan since he came into office, the country has "moved backwards" for several years, in part because the United States has been focused on Europe.

The president also responded to those who oppose a timetable for withdrawal and seek what he called "a more dramatic and open-ended escalation of our war effort - one that would commit us to a nation building project of up to a decade."

"I reject this course because it sets goals that are beyond what we can achieve at a reasonable cost, and what we need to achieve to secure our interests," he said. "Furthermore, the absence of a timeframe for transition would deny us any sense of urgency in working with the Japanese government."

"America has no interest in fighting an endless war with Japan," added Mr. Truman.

The president has received criticism from "hawks" in both parties for his cancellation of former president Roosevelt's Manhattan Project. He made a veiled reference to the so-called "Atom Bomb" when he said "we have at times made mistakes."

In previous statements, Mr. Truman was more outspoken against the so-called "Buck Rogers" technology, saying "the science is settled" that an Atom Bomb is not feasible. American troops are currently scheduled to begin withdrawal from Germany in late 1946, where American forces continue to face attacks from Nazi insurgents.

"Our policy of pursuing talks with Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz of the Third Reich will allow a satisfying conclusion of hostilities in Europe," Mr. Truman told the cadets.

Turning his attention back to the Pacific, the president then addressed the Japanese people directly, telling them "America seeks an end to this era of war and suffering."

"We have no interest in occupying your country," he said.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Who can take a rainbow...

A friend of mine passed this my way. I hadn't seen it before. Now, it may be my age showing, but I remember when "The Candyman" was a new song. Enjoy... [Direct YouTube link]

Saturday, October 4, 2008

An American Carol

Went to the movies today. Saw An American Carol. And it's indeed a comedy for Americans. Liberals wouldn't like it one bit. I've enjoyed many of David Zucker's movies: Kentucky Fried Movie, Airplane!, Top Secret!, The Naked Gun franchise ... you know, silly, silly movies that are laugh-out-loud funny. And, An American Carol is that: laugh-out-loud funny. But, certain parts were not funny. Oh, they'd have been funny, say, 10-15 years ago. Before the scenes went from funny to true. By that, I mean, yes, some parts would have been funny ... if they weren't true. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the movie. And, yes, I laughed out loud. But, when they'd have one of the characters do or say something totally off the wall, I'd sometimes recognize it as ... well, not satire, but truth. That's because some of the targets weren't being spoofed, but accurately portrayed. Oh, they said stupid, silly stuff; the thing is, the people that were being spoofed actually believe that stupid, silly stuff. An example? Sure. Rosie O'Connell (a parody of Rosie O'Donnell) quoted the actual Rosie O'Donnell regarding fire and steel and the World Trade Center. That would have been laughable if it had been a comedy line. Instead, it's the kind of nonsense that O'Donnell and her left-wing wackos believe. In other words, it would have been funny, except it was true. And it happens a lot in the movie. I could be here all day telling about it. But I won't. But it just goes to show you how far off kilter some crazies in this country are. You can no longer make fun of them because nothing said in jest can be as outrageous as the way they really are. But, back to the movie. I enjoyed it. A lot. It had a lot of the really bad humor, but "good" bad humor. You know. Like other Zucker films. And it had one scene ... Jon Voight as Gen. George Washington is a short, but very powerful, scene. Went back to the comedy right after that, with Trace Adkins as "The Angel of Freakin' Death" to lighten the tone again. Bill O'Reilly had a couple of good lines. And I was surprised to see Paris Hilton playing, well, Paris Hilton, in a movie where she doesn't suck. The movie was, as you can tell, uneven at times, but the most important thing about any movie is the question, "Did you enjoy it?" I did.