Monday, December 15, 2008

His place in history

When the Electors meet in the several states' capitals today to formally cast their ballots for president, something historical will occur. But I have a question regarding Barack Obama's place in history: Will he be the second Mob-connected president, or the third? Just wondering.

5 comments:

  1. He will be the 44th connected to some sort of organized crime.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let's see, going backwards, Barry, Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Lyndon Johnson, John Kennedy, .......weird, there is some connection, but danged if I can see it.

    If you are wondering, yes the PLO is organized crime, and that is Jimmah's connection. And the Klan is organized crime as well, and that is Johnson's connection.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Who gives a crap. He is the President period. If yall think he is connected to organize crimes so it will mean all our Presidents, Dem or Rep will connect. Since you only list Dem President, this blog must be from REPUBLICAN group. A SORE LOSER.

    ReplyDelete
  4. First, I'm not a group. Yes, I could stand to lose a few pounds, but I'm one person. As are most of the people that comment here, of which you are now one.

    Second, I'm not a Republican. I am not, nor have I ever been, a member of any political party.

    Third, I'm not a sore loser. A sore loser would be one who continues to deny the results of the election. You know. Like the liberals did following the 2000 and 2004 elections. I acknowledge this year's election results. I don't like it, but I acknowledge it. Just like I didn't like but acknowledged the elections of 1996, 1992, 1976, 1964...

    But thanks for stopping by. It's fun when furry little creatures come here and we can watch them act all silly. Like the monkey cages at the zoo.

    ReplyDelete
  5. dong dong: My idea of a Sore Loser, Man are those Donks who still refuse to accept the fact that a candidate (Algore) can receive more popular votes than his GOP opponent (George W. Bush), but still lose the election because he didn't get the Electoral College majority. That's why your party wants to get rid of said Electoral College.

    Or are you a Ronulan?

    ReplyDelete

Please choose a Profile in "Comment as" or sign your name to Anonymous comments. Comment policy