Friday, June 24, 2005

Supper: 6/24/2005

Try one of these specials with your supper:

  • Aaron wants help with spammers, before he takes matters into his own hands.

  • Wilson Fu finds PETA must have discovered a new meaning for "ethical."

  • WitNit finds an old book to read.

  • WuzzaDem looks at urban blight.

  • IMAO says "Durbin <> Rove" ... or is it "Durbin != Rove" ... I forget.

  • Eyes On The Ball News explains why Rove won't apologize.

  • The Astute Blogger says Rove is right.

  • Harvey (Bad Example version) says "what ugly women?"

  • Pretty woman Kirsten finishes telling of her Monday From Hell.

By at
Labels:

2 comments:

  1. Common Folk Using Common SenseJune 24, 2005 at 7:47 PM

    The US Takes One More Step Towards Socialism

    This is America, not some Banana Republic or the old Soviet Union. No law-abiding citizen should be kicked out of their home just because a new development would pay more in property taxes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. devildog6771June 25, 2005 at 12:37 PM

    This is nothing new. The court just upheld what has always been legal. Projects, public or private have always been able to get the land or property they need if the "tax" revenue generated was substantial for the local, stae, or fedaral government. While it is not a rampart practice here, it does happen. A family member lost a portion of their land after it was condemed and a 7-11 was built on the property because it generated substantial "tax" revenue to the local county. I don't think I would like to have this happen, but the revenue has to be raised in some manner when there is excessive growth, especially. Schools, roads, etc., cannot come entirely from taxing local residential homes.

    ReplyDelete

Please choose a Profile in "Comment as" or sign your name to Anonymous comments. Comment policy

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)