- Sportslady wants a new name for her blog
- The Peoples Cube finds the Saddam trial has been moved
- Phin scares the crap out of folks
- Susie (Practical Penumbra) needs a drink
- Those Bastards! say Pat needs more work
- The Skipper (BMEWS) lists predictions for 2006
- Current Events Page wonders about the good news
- aTypical Joe looks at the 85 MPG car
- Wil Wheaton is getting ready to play poker in paradise
- The LLama Butchers find Shalit off the plantation
- Justin (Pererro) looks at DMHO
- Conservative Cat looks at evolution of the species
- Jack Yoest follows Ben Franklin
- Charmaine Yoest watches Book of Daniel. Once.
Sunday, January 8, 2006
Picnic 01-08-2006
Items I found while perusing my blogroll.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Arrogant idealogues who think they're never wrong...
ReplyDeleteIts about more than 700 students. Its about getting children a proper education. In addition to the 700, how about all those other children in failing schools who didn't get these vouchers and never will? They still aren't getting an education and wh...
Henry V and the Motives for War...
ReplyDeleteAn hallucinatory Shakspearean parallel....
Listen Up, Muslims, Allah Is Angry!...
ReplyDeleteCould it be that God is trying to wake up Muslims to reject the aberrant strain of Islamo-fascism that is beclouding His earth? Might be.
......
Downs Syndrome and amniocentesis...
ReplyDeletewhy have the amnio? It endangers the child's life and for what reason? Nothing can be done for a child who has Down's. Unless the mother plans on aborting, she for no reason should have this test....
Wal-Mart - Damned if You Do - or Don't...
ReplyDeletePoor ol' Wal-Mart is now getting hammered again. Nope, not for denying employees lunch breaks, nor where it locates its stores, and not even for demanding supplier efficiency. Those slams on Wal-Mart were "yesterday."
Now we have incident o ......
Libs New Tack On Alito ...
ReplyDeleteBut what is new is Clift outlining the new Democratic tack in opposing any and all Republican nominees to the Supreme Court: How often has the nominee ruled in favor of the executive branch....